Reviews

History, Memory, and the Fallen Jew


The Faith of Fallen Jews: Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi and the Writing of Jewish History

edited by David N. Myers and Alexander Kaye

Brandeis University Press, 376 pp., $40

 

The publication of most of Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi’s lesser-known essays and smaller writings, competently edited and informatively introduced by David N. Myers and Alexander Kaye, provides an occasion to reflect more generally upon the man and his work. Yerushalmi, who passed away in 2009 at the age of 77, was a pre-eminent—and certainly most widely known—Jewish historian of his time. Enamored with the study of ruptures, crises, and fissures, he was bent on enunciating the dilemmas of “fallen Jews,” ranging from the conversos of the Iberian peninsula to Sigmund Freud and, indeed, scholars like himself. Yerushalmi was as much a sensitive product of his fractured time as he was a key expositor of its predicament.

Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi

Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi in an undated photo.

Although he resisted the postmodern winds blowing around him and possessed an erudite command of the Judaic tradition, Yerushalmi was unwilling and, more probably, unsuited to write a flowing coherent historical narrative such as the one that his beloved teacher Salo Baron had attempted. There are those who claim that Yerushalmi, always a complex, enigmatic man, simply lacked the energy and initiative to undertake such a task. It is true that apart from some important essays, he did not really follow up systematically on the history of Spanish and Portuguese Jewry and the Sephardi diaspora after his first book. Still, this is uncharitable and probably misses the main point. For Yerushalmi believed that a unified, meaningful account of the pattern of all of Jewish life was no longer possible. Baron’s monumental A Social and Religious History of the Jews was, he said, probably “the last serious attempt by a single historian to embrace the whole of Jewish history.” The time for overarching meta-narratives seemed to be over, even if, as he insisted, the search for discrete historical truths was not.

This article is locked

Subscribe now for immediate and unlimited access to Web + Print + App + Archive
  • Already a subscriber? Log in to continue reading.
  • Not quite ready to subscribe? Register now for your choice of 3 FREE articles per quarter.
  • Already a registered user? Log in here.

About the Author

Steven E. Aschheim is emeritus professor of history at The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. He is currently a Straus/Tikvah Fellow at NYU’s Straus Institute for the Advanced Study of Law & Justice. His most recent book is At the Edges of Liberalism: Junctions of European, German, and Jewish History (Palgrave Macmillan).

Comments

gwhepner on April 2, 2014 at 9:31 pm
SHEDDING ABSOLUTELY NO LIGHT ON MOSES

Concentrating on Freud’s most notorious historical
delusions Hayim Yerushalmi stamped with zakhor the most unreliable
messages of this deluded spokesman of an oracle
whose message proved the Doktor was not only mad but certifiable.

Although nonsense always remains nonsense but its scientific study
is science, as Saul Lieberman most famously once said, apotheosis
bestowed on Freud by taking his ideas most seriously will muddy
all scientists who do this and shed absolutely no light upon Moses.

[email protected]

Want to post a comment? Please register or log in.

Most Read

What Jesus Wasn’t: Zealot

When Fox News' Lauren Green asked Reza. . .

Conservative Judaism: A Requiem

In 1971, 41 percent of American Jews. . .

Editors' Picks

Paradox or Pluralism?

Walzer’s paradox of liberation, if. . .

Lucky Grossman

Vasily Grossman was one of the principal. . .

The Future Past Perfect

Treasure and tragedy in the letters of. . .

In The Next JRB

  • Matti Friedman on Sons and Soldiers
  • Rachel Biale on We Were the Future
  • Bernard Wasserstein on Mark Mazower What You Did Not Tell
  • And more...
Copyright © 2017 Jewish Review of Books. All Rights Reserved. | Site by W&B