Across the internet, around Shabbat dinner tables, thousands of readers have been discussing Hillel Halkin’s eloquent, despairing essay about the new Israeli government. We continue this lively and critical discussion with responses from some of today’s most interesting and engaging thinkers about Israeli politics.
- Emily Amrousi applauds the election results but sees little real change coming to Israeli society.
- Elli Fischer argues that Halkin (and the poet Y.L. Gordon) are wrong about both modern Israel and the bible. It was the prophet Jeremiah, not the king Zedekiah, who represents a healthy society.
- While Mosheh Lichtenstein agrees there are serious problems facing Israeli society, he sees Halkin’s stance as a complete misreading of Orthodox Judaism’s values and value.
- Ze’ev Maghen defends the new coalition, and worries that Halkin has lost his way.
- Mikhael Manekin takes issue with Halkin’s reliance on demographics, and seeks a path forward free of division and recriminations.
- Neil Rogachevsky contrasts Halkin’s use of the poem “Zedekiah in the Dungeon” by Yehuda Leib Gordon with David Ben-Gurion’s own curiously prescient, and more pragmatic, reading.
- In contrast to Halkin’s fatalism, Gil Troy argues that Zionism’s future can be as strong as its past, so long as its adherents do not abandon hope.
Review a book for us and perhaps win a book in return!
Garden Betrayed, Mysterium Tremendum or Coping Mechanism?, Lucifer in the Details
In locating Disraeli within modern Jewish history, the late David Cesarani engages with a tradition that he traces back to Hannah Arendt and Isaiah Berlin, who placed Disraeli’s Jewishness at the heart of his private life, his novels, his political thought, and his career as a politician.
Sayed Kashua's new novel presents a characteristic depiction of the dual identities of Israel's Arabs.